CULTURE & COSMOS

January 4, 2005 Volume 2, Number 22

Social Science Confirms Harmful Effects of Contraception

The predictions found in Pope Paul VI's encyclical affirming the

Catholic Church's constant teaching that artificial contraception is wrong

have been confirmed by the social sciences which show that ignoring the

Church doctrine on sex and marriage is harmful to individuals and society.

These are the findings of a Nobel Prize winning social scientist.

Writing in the current issue of Touchstone Magazine University of

Virginia professor W. Bradford Wilcox writes that when the encyclical,

"Humane Vitae," was published in 1968 it was surrounded with controversy.

In it Pope Paul said widespread use of contraception would lead to

"conjugal infidelity and the general lowering of morality." The Pope said

men would no longer respect women but would treat them as a "mere

instrument of selfish enjoyment, and no longer as his respected and

beloved companion."

"Humane Vitae's" publication was met with vigorous protest by many

prominent American clergy who were also academics. They said the Church's

continued ban on contraception proved that Church authorities were

indifferent to the plight of "real people." Thirty-six years later Wilcox

says that an examination of the effects of the contraceptive mentality on

society shows that it is those who dissent from "Humane Vitae" that are

indifferent.

Wilcox, an assistant professor of sociology at UVA, cites research by

six scholars which shows contraception to be responsible for a significant

rise in divorce and illegitimacy, both of which lead to other social ills

like heightened rates of criminal behavior and increased high school drop

out rates. Wilcox also argues that the poor are especially susceptible to

the harms caused by the contraceptive culture. Wilcox notes that the

research is not partisan. "The leading scholars who have tackled these

topics are not Christians, and most of them are not political or social

conservatives"

Robert Michael, of the University of Chicago, believes that sudden

widespread use of artificial contraception and the availability of

abortion is responsible for "about half of the increase in divorce from

1965 to 1976." Wilcox cites George Akerlof, a Nobel prize-winning

economist, who provides an economic explanation for why widespread use of

artificial contraception resulted in an increase in illegitimacy rather

than a decrease as many predicted.

According to Akerlof, traditional women who wanted to either abstain

from sex or at least receive a promise from their boyfriend that he would

marry her in the case of pregnancy could no longer compete with "modern"

women who embraced contraception. This created an environment in which

premarital sex became the norm and women "felt free or obligated to have

sex." "Thus, many traditional women ended up having sex and having

children out of wedlock, while many of the permissive women ended up

having sex and contraception or aborting so as to avoid childbearing. This

explains in large part why the contraceptive revolution was associated

with an increase in both abortion and illegitimacy."

Wilcox says contraceptives remove one of the key reasons to getting

married, the moral incentive. And while many members of the middle and

upper classes marry because they know it serves their economic interest,

the second key incentive for marrying, the poor are much more likely to

marry solely for moral reasons. The result is that in the contraceptive

era the poor have even less of an incentive to marry than do other

classes. For this reason the poor have been hit even harder by the

negative consequences that came about through widespread use of

contraceptives.

unlimited use. Credit required.

Culture of Life Foundation

1413 K Street, NW, Suite 1000

Washington DC 20005

Phone: (202) 289-2500

Fax: (202) 289-2502

E-mail: clf@culture-of-life.org

Website: http://www.culture-of-life.org